DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comes from NVIDIA. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released in September 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) followed a month later in October 2026. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is the larger model at roughly 552 billion parameters, against 120 billion for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads on 3 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores 90.6% against 66.7%; Humanity's Last Exam, where DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores 36.8% against 31.8%. Averaged across everything we track, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash sits at 60.2% and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) at 60.9%.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is the cheaper API at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens, about 50% below DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at $0.30 and $1.20. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B). DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash accepts text and images as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
CompanyDeepSeekNVIDIA
Release DateSeptember 10, 2026October 15, 2026
Parameters552B120B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)393K262K
Input Price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output Price / 1M$1.20$1.00
Average Score60.2%60.9%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.190.6%66.7%
Humanity's Last Exam36.8%31.8%
GPQA Diamond90.9%89.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.7
0.9
0.7
Humanity's Last Exam0.4 vs 0.3
0.4
0.3
GPQA Diamond0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) — 0.6.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 1.3x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.30/1M tokens.

Context Window

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is newer: released 10/15/2026 vs 9/10/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.30.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.