DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs GLM-5.3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is developed by DeepSeek, while GLM-5.3 comes from Zhipu AI. Both were released in August 2026. GLM-5.3 has a published size of about 753 billion parameters; DeepSeek has not disclosed the parameter count of DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. GLM-5.3 leads on 4 of them. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where GLM-5.3 scores 48.2% against 25.7%; Terminal-Bench 2.1, where GLM-5.3 scores 88.0% against 83.9%. Averaged across everything we track, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp sits at 50.4% and GLM-5.3 at 52.2%.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is the cheaper API at $0.22 per million input tokens and $0.66 per million output tokens, roughly 6 times cheaper than GLM-5.3 at $1.40 and $4.40. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp accepts text and images as input, while GLM-5.3 accepts text. On tooling, only GLM-5.3 supports function calling and only GLM-5.3 offers structured output.

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpGLM-5.3
CompanyDeepSeekZhipu AI
Release DateAugust 21, 2026August 14, 2026
Parameters753B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)393K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.22$1.40
Output Price / 1M$0.66$4.40
Average Score50.4%52.2%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench25.7%48.2%
Terminal-Bench 2.183.9%88.0%
Agents' Last Exam27.3%28.5%
NL2Repo57.7%58.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
GLM-5.3
AutomationBench0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
Agents' Last Exam0.3 vs 0.3
0.3
0.3
NL2Repo0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — 0.5, GLM-5.3 — 0.5.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 6.6x cheaper: input $0.22/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/21/2026 and 8/14/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is cheaper for input: $0.22 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5.3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5.3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.