DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
CompanyDeepSeekNVIDIA
Release DateAugust 21, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters30B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)393K262K
Input Price / 1M$0.22$0.05
Output Price / 1M$0.66$0.20
Average Score0.50.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — 0.5, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.8.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 3.5x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $0.22/1M tokens.

Context Window

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/21/2026 and 8/11/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $0.22.
Which has a larger context window — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,100.

The DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.