Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI, while Qwen3.8 Max comes from Alibaba. Qwen3.8 Max was released in August 2026, and Ember-1 followed a month later in September 2026. The two are similar in size, at about 2.8 trillion and 2.4 trillion parameters respectively.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. They split them evenly, 1 to 1. The widest gaps are on DeepSWE 1.1, where Ember-1 scores 75.2% against 56.6%; Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Qwen3.8 Max scores 86.6% against 82.0%. Averaged across everything we track, Ember-1 sits at 78.8% and Qwen3.8 Max at 71.0%.

Qwen3.8 Max is the cheaper API at $2.50 per million input tokens and $6.25 per million output tokens, about 20% below Ember-1 at $3 and $15. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Ember-1 accepts text as input, while Qwen3.8 Max accepts text and images.

CharacteristicEmber-1Qwen3.8 Max
CompanyFireworks AIAlibaba
Release DateSeptember 23, 2026August 2, 2026
Parameters2.8T2.4T
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)—131K
Input Price / 1M$3.00$2.50
Output Price / 1M$15.00$6.25
Average Score78.8%71.0%
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.175.2%56.6%
Terminal-Bench 2.182.0%86.6%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Ember-1
Qwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE 1.10.8 vs 0.6
0.8
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Max leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Ember-1 — 0.8, Qwen3.8 Max — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Max is 2.1x cheaper: input $2.50/1M vs $3.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Max supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Ember-1 is newer: released 9/23/2026 vs 8/2/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Ember-1 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Ember-1 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper for input: $2.50 per 1M tokens vs $3.00.
Which has a larger context window — Ember-1 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,040,000.

The Ember-1 and Qwen3.8 Max comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ember-1 or Qwen3.8 Max page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.