Gemini 3 Pro vs MiniMax M2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Gemini 3 Pro | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | MiniMax | |
| Release Date | November 17, 2025 | December 22, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 66K | 100K |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.30 |
| Output Price / 1M | $12.00 | $1.20 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Gemini 3 Pro
MiniMax M2.1
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
Verdict
MiniMax M2.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3 Pro — 0.9, MiniMax M2.1 — 0.9.
API Cost
MiniMax M2.1 is 9.3x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.
Recency
MiniMax M2.1 is newer: released 12/22/2025 vs 11/17/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The Gemini 3 Pro and MiniMax M2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3 Pro or MiniMax M2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.