Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGemini 3 ProQwen3 VL 4B Thinking
CompanyGoogleAlibaba
Release DateNovember 17, 2025September 22, 2025
Parameters4B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)66K262K
Input Price / 1M$2.00$0.10
Output Price / 1M$12.00$1.00
Average Score0.90.9

Verdict

Gemini 3 Pro leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3 Pro — 0.9, Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 12.7x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Gemini 3 Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Gemini 3 Pro is newer: released 11/17/2025 vs 9/22/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?
Gemini 3 Pro supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.