Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.5?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $2.50.

Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.5?

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 131,072.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	Gemini 3.1 Pro	GLM-4.5
Company	Google	Zhipu AI
Release Date	February 19, 2026	July 27, 2025
Parameters	—	355B
Multimodal	Yes	No
Context (input)	1.0M	131K
Context (output)	66K	98K
Input Price / 1M	$2.50	$0.60
Output Price / 1M	$15.00	$2.20
Average Score	0.8	0.8
Benchmarks
GPQA	0.9	0.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro

GLM-4.5

GPQA0.9 vs 0.8

0.9

0.8

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8, GLM-4.5 — 0.8.

API Cost

GLM-4.5 is 6.3x cheaper: input $0.60/1M vs $2.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 7/27/2025.

More About These Models

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google — specs, benchmarks, API

GLM-4.5

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro vs LongCat-Flash-Lite Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4 mini

All model comparisons →

The Gemini 3.1 Pro and GLM-4.5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.