Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.1 Pro or LongCat-Flash-Lite?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.1 Pro or LongCat-Flash-Lite?

API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.

Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.1 Pro or LongCat-Flash-Lite?

Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs LongCat-Flash-Lite: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	Gemini 3.1 Pro	LongCat-Flash-Lite
Company	Google	Meituan
Release Date	February 19, 2026	February 4, 2026
Parameters	—	69B
Multimodal	Yes	No
Context (input)	1.0M	—
Context (output)	66K	—
Input Price / 1M	$2.50	—
Output Price / 1M	$15.00	—
Average Score	0.8	0.8
Benchmarks
GPQA	0.9	0.7

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro

LongCat-Flash-Lite

GPQA0.9 vs 0.7

0.9

0.7

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8, LongCat-Flash-Lite — 0.8.

Recency

Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 2/4/2026.

More About These Models

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google — specs, benchmarks, API

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Meituan — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4 mini LongCat-Flash-Lite vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

All model comparisons →

The Gemini 3.1 Pro and LongCat-Flash-Lite comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.1 Pro or LongCat-Flash-Lite page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.