Gemini 3.1 Pro vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.1 Pro | LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meituan | |
| Release Date | February 19, 2026 | January 13, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 560B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 66K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.50 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $15.00 | — |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| SWE-bench Verified | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| HLE | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
SWE-bench Verified0.8 vs 0.6
0.8
0.6
HLE0.5 vs 0.3
0.5
0.3
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in 1 out of 3 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 — 0.8.
Programming
On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 — 0.6.
Recency
Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 1/13/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The Gemini 3.1 Pro and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.1 Pro or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.