Gemini 3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicGemini 3.1 ProMiniMax M2
CompanyGoogleMiniMax
Release DateFebruary 19, 2026October 26, 2025
Parameters230B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)66K100K
Input Price / 1M$2.50$1.00
Output Price / 1M$15.00$4.00
Average Score0.80.8
Benchmarks
GPQA0.90.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro
MiniMax M2
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8, MiniMax M2 — 0.8.

API Cost

MiniMax M2 is 3.5x cheaper: input $1.00/1M vs $2.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 10/26/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M2?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M2?
MiniMax M2 is cheaper for input: $1.00 per 1M tokens vs $2.50.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Gemini 3.1 Pro and MiniMax M2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.