Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Qwen3 235B A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | February 19, 2026 | April 28, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 235B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 128K |
| Context (output) | 66K | 128K |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.20 |
| Output Price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.60 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| MMMLU | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Qwen3 235B A22B
MMMLU0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro — 0.8, Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9.
API Cost
Qwen3 235B A22B is 21.9x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $2.50/1M tokens.
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.
Recency
Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 4/28/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3 235B A22B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.