Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | February 19, 2026 | September 21, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 33B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 66K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.50 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $15.00 | — |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 144.5 |
Verdict
Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.
Overall Performance
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows a higher average benchmark score: 144.5 vs 0.8.
Recency
Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: released 2/19/2026 vs 9/21/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.