Which is better for coding — GLM-4.5 or Qwen3.5 27B?

Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.5 or Qwen3.5 27B?

API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.5 or Qwen3.5 27B?

Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3.5 27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GLM-4.5	Qwen3.5 27B
Company	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Release Date	July 27, 2025	March 1, 2026
Parameters	355B	27B
Multimodal	No	No
Context (input)	131K	—
Context (output)	98K	—
Input Price / 1M	$0.60	—
Output Price / 1M	$2.20	—
Average Score	0.8	0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.5 27B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.5 — 0.8, Qwen3.5 27B — 0.9.

Recency

Qwen3.5 27B is newer: released 3/1/2026 vs 7/27/2025.

More About These Models

GLM-4.5

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

Qwen3.5 27B

Alibaba — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.5 vs GLM-5 GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GLM-4.5 GLM-4.5 vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) vs GLM-4.5 GLM-4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.5 and Qwen3.5 27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.5 or Qwen3.5 27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.