Which is better for coding — GLM-4.7-Flash or MiniMax M2.5?

On the SWE-Bench benchmark, MiniMax M2.5 shows a better result: 0.8 vs 0.6.

Which model is cheaper — GLM-4.7-Flash or MiniMax M2.5?

API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.

Which has a larger context window — GLM-4.7-Flash or MiniMax M2.5?

Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax M2.5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Characteristic	GLM-4.7-Flash	MiniMax M2.5
Company	Zhipu AI	MiniMax
Release Date	January 18, 2026	February 11, 2026
Parameters	30B	230B
Multimodal	No	Yes
Context (input)	128K	—
Context (output)	16K	—
Input Price / 1M	$0.07	—
Output Price / 1M	$0.40	—
Average Score	0.6	0.7
Benchmarks
BrowseComp	0.4	0.8
SWE-Bench Verified	0.6	0.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash

MiniMax M2.5

BrowseComp0.4 vs 0.8

0.4

0.8

SWE-Bench Verified0.6 vs 0.8

0.6

0.8

Verdict

MiniMax M2.5 leads in 1 out of 3 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, MiniMax M2.5 — 0.7.

Programming

On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6, MiniMax M2.5 — 0.8.

Recency

MiniMax M2.5 is newer: released 2/11/2026 vs 1/18/2026.

More About These Models

GLM-4.7-Flash

Zhipu AI — specs, benchmarks, API

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax — specs, benchmarks, API

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5 GLM-4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.2 Codex GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mercury 2 GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.3 Codex MiniMax M2.1 vs MiniMax M2.5

All model comparisons →

The GLM-4.7-Flash and MiniMax M2.5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-4.7-Flash or MiniMax M2.5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.