GLM-5.1 vs MiniMax M3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.1 | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | MiniMax |
| Release Date | April 7, 2026 | June 1, 2026 |
| Parameters | 754B | 428B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 200K | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 131K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | $0.30 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | $1.20 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Verdict
MiniMax M3 leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.1 — 0.9, MiniMax M3 — 0.9.
API Cost
MiniMax M3 is 3.9x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Context Window
MiniMax M3 supports a larger context: 1M vs 200K tokens.
Recency
MiniMax M3 is newer: released 6/1/2026 vs 4/7/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M3?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000.
The GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.