GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | April 7, 2026 | July 24, 2025 |
| Parameters | 754B | 235B |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Context (input) | 200K | 256K |
| Context (output) | 131K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | $0.30 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | $3.00 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Verdict
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.1 — 0.9, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 — 0.9.
API Cost
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 1.8x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Context Window
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports a larger context: 256K vs 200K tokens.
Recency
GLM-5.1 is newer: released 4/7/2026 vs 7/24/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports a larger context: 256,000 tokens vs 200,000.
The GLM-5.1 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.1 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.