GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | April 7, 2026 | August 14, 2026 |
| Parameters | 754B | 28B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 200K | — |
| Context (output) | 131K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | — |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.1
Qwen3.8-27B
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3.8-27B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.1 — 0.9, Qwen3.8-27B — 0.7.
Recency
Qwen3.8-27B is newer: released 8/14/2026 vs 4/7/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The GLM-5.1 and Qwen3.8-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.8-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.