Inkling-Small vs Muse Spark 1.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicInkling-SmallMuse Spark 1.1
CompanyThinking Machines LabMeta
Release DateJuly 30, 2026July 9, 2026
Parameters276B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)256K1.0M
Context (output)256K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.30$1.25
Output Price / 1M$1.20$4.25
Average Score0.60.8
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.10.60.8
CharXiv-R0.80.9
MCP Atlas0.80.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Inkling-Small
Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench 2.10.6 vs 0.8
0.6
0.8
CharXiv-R0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
MCP Atlas0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9

Verdict

Inkling-Small leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Inkling-Small — 0.6, Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.8.

API Cost

Inkling-Small is 3.7x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

Muse Spark 1.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Inkling-Small is newer: released 7/30/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1?
Inkling-Small is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000.

The Inkling-Small and Muse Spark 1.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.