Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicInkling-SmallQwen3.8-27B
CompanyThinking Machines LabAlibaba
Release DateJuly 30, 2026August 14, 2026
Parameters276B28B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)256K
Context (output)256K
Input Price / 1M$0.30
Output Price / 1M$1.20
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
CharXiv-R0.80.9
Terminal-Bench 2.10.60.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.60.6
IFBench0.80.8
Humanity's Last Exam0.30.3
GPQA0.90.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Inkling-Small
Qwen3.8-27B
CharXiv-R0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
Terminal-Bench 2.10.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
IFBench0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
Humanity's Last Exam0.3 vs 0.3
0.3
0.3
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.8-27B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Inkling-Small — 0.6, Qwen3.8-27B — 0.7.

Recency

Qwen3.8-27B is newer: released 8/14/2026 vs 7/30/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8-27B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8-27B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.