Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicInkling-SmallQwen3.8 Flash
CompanyThinking Machines LabAlibaba
Release DateJuly 30, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters276B125B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)256K1.0M
Context (output)256K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.30$0.15
Output Price / 1M$1.20$0.47
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
Toolathlon0.50.7
CharXiv-R0.80.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.60.6
Humanity's Last Exam0.30.4
GPQA0.90.9
IFBench0.80.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Inkling-Small
Qwen3.8 Flash
Toolathlon0.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
CharXiv-R0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
Humanity's Last Exam0.3 vs 0.4
0.3
0.4
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
IFBench0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Inkling-Small — 0.6, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash is 2.4x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $0.30/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/30/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $0.30.
Which has a larger context window — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 256,000.

The Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.