Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba |
| Release Date | July 30, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Parameters | 276B | 180B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 256K | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 256K | 66K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.16 |
| Output Price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.47 |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Toolathlon | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| IFBench | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Inkling-Small
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Toolathlon0.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
IFBench0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
Verdict
Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Inkling-Small — 0.6, Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7.
API Cost
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is 2.4x cheaper: input $0.16/1M vs $0.30/1M tokens.
Context Window
Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.
Recency
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/30/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper for input: $0.16 per 1M tokens vs $0.30.
Which has a larger context window — Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 256,000.
The Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8 Flash Next page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.