K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicK-EXAONE-236B-A23BMiniMax M2
CompanyLG AI ResearchMiniMax
Release DateDecember 30, 2025October 26, 2025
Parameters236B230B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)33K1.0M
Context (output)33K100K
Input Price / 1M$0.60$1.00
Output Price / 1M$1.00$4.00
Average Score0.80.8
Benchmarks
AIME 20250.90.8
MMLU-Pro0.80.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
MiniMax M2
AIME 20250.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
MMLU-Pro0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: K-EXAONE-236B-A23B — 0.8, MiniMax M2 — 0.8.

API Cost

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 3.1x cheaper: input $0.60/1M vs $1.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

MiniMax M2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 33K tokens.

Recency

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is newer: released 12/30/2025 vs 10/26/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M2?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M2?
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $1.00.
Which has a larger context window — K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M2?
MiniMax M2 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 32,768.

The K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and MiniMax M2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.