Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Wonder Full: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Laguna S 2.1 is developed by Poolside, while Muse Wonder Full comes from Meta. Laguna S 2.1 was released in July 2026, and Muse Wonder Full followed 3 months later in October 2026. Laguna S 2.1 has a published size of about 118 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Wonder Full.
We have 6 benchmark results for Laguna S 2.1 and 16 benchmark results for Muse Wonder Full, but they overlap on a single test: DeepSWE 1.1, where Muse Wonder Full scores 79.0% against 40.4%.
Laguna S 2.1 is available through an API at $0.10 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Muse Wonder Full, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | Laguna S 2.1 | Muse Wonder Full |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Poolside | Meta |
| Release Date | July 21, 2026 | October 12, 2026 |
| Parameters | 118B | — |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.10 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Average Score | 57.4% | 57.1% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 | 40.4% | 79.0% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
Muse Wonder Full leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6, Muse Wonder Full — 0.6.
Muse Wonder Full is newer: released 10/12/2026 vs 7/21/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Wonder Full?
Which model is cheaper — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Wonder Full?
Which has a larger context window — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Wonder Full?
The Laguna S 2.1 and Muse Wonder Full comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Wonder Full page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.