LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Spark 1.3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI, while Muse Spark 1.3 comes from Meta. LFM2.5-2.6B was released in August 2026, and Muse Spark 1.3 followed a month later in September 2026. LFM2.5-2.6B has a published size of about 3 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Spark 1.3.
We have 8 benchmark results for LFM2.5-2.6B and 11 benchmark results for Muse Spark 1.3, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.
Muse Spark 1.3 is available through an API at $1.25 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for LFM2.5-2.6B, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | LFM2.5-2.6B | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Liquid AI | Meta |
| Release Date | August 4, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Parameters | 3B | — |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | — | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | — | 944K |
| Input Price / 1M | — | $1.25 |
| Output Price / 1M | — | $4.25 |
| Average Score | 55.5% | 73.4% |
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.3 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: LFM2.5-2.6B — 0.6, Muse Spark 1.3 — 0.7.
Muse Spark 1.3 is newer: released 9/2/2026 vs 8/4/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — LFM2.5-2.6B or Muse Spark 1.3?
Which model is cheaper — LFM2.5-2.6B or Muse Spark 1.3?
Which has a larger context window — LFM2.5-2.6B or Muse Spark 1.3?
The LFM2.5-2.6B and Muse Spark 1.3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the LFM2.5-2.6B or Muse Spark 1.3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.