Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer-30B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while Muse Glimmer-30B comes from Meta. Muse Glimmer-30B was released in August 2026, and Ling 3.1 Flash followed a month later in September 2026. Ling 3.1 Flash is the larger model at roughly 560 billion parameters, against 30 billion for Muse Glimmer-30B.
We have 11 benchmark results for Ling 3.1 Flash and 25 benchmark results for Muse Glimmer-30B, but they overlap on a single test: SkillsBench, where Ling 3.1 Flash scores 68.7% against 44.3%.
| Characteristic | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Glimmer-30B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | InclusionAI | Meta |
| Release Date | September 30, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
| Parameters | 560B | 30B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Average Score | 65.0% | 65.1% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| SkillsBench | 68.7% | 44.3% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
Ling 3.1 Flash leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.1 Flash — 0.6, Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7.
Ling 3.1 Flash is newer: released 9/30/2026 vs 8/10/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Ling 3.1 Flash or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.1 Flash or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.1 Flash or Muse Glimmer-30B?
The Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Glimmer-30B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.1 Flash or Muse Glimmer-30B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.