MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicMiniMax M3Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
CompanyMiniMaxAlibaba
Release DateJune 1, 2026September 22, 2025
Parameters428B4B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)131K262K
Input Price / 1M$0.30$0.10
Output Price / 1M$1.20$0.60
Average Score0.90.9

Verdict

MiniMax M3 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: MiniMax M3 — 0.9, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 2.1x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $0.30/1M tokens.

Context Window

MiniMax M3 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

MiniMax M3 is newer: released 6/1/2026 vs 9/22/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — MiniMax M3 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — MiniMax M3 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $0.30.
Which has a larger context window — MiniMax M3 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?
MiniMax M3 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 262,144.

The MiniMax M3 and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the MiniMax M3 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.