Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicMuse Glimmer-30BQwen3.8 Flash
CompanyMetaAlibaba
Release DateAugust 10, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters30B125B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$0.15
Output Price / 1M$0.47
Average Score0.70.7
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam0.20.4
CharXiv-R0.80.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.50.6
GPQA0.80.9
IFBench0.80.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Muse Glimmer-30B
Qwen3.8 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam0.2 vs 0.4
0.2
0.4
CharXiv-R0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
GPQA0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
IFBench0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/10/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3.8 Flash?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.