Muse Glimmer-30B vs Seed 2.1 Pro: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
.svg?dpl=dpl_ELZfsEwZWBkW2NFewZMHoqbrXGML){kind=icon}
| Characteristic | Muse Glimmer-30B | Seed 2.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meta | ByteDance |
| Release Date | August 10, 2026 | June 24, 2026 |
| Parameters | 30B | — |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Average Score | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| SciCode | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| WildClawBench | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| MMMU-Pro | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| MCP Atlas | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| CharXiv-R | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Muse Glimmer-30B
Seed 2.1 Pro
Humanity's Last Exam0.2 vs 0.6
0.2
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.5 vs 0.7
0.5
0.7
SciCode0.4 vs 0.6
0.4
0.6
WildClawBench0.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
MMMU-Pro0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
MCP Atlas0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
CharXiv-R0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
Verdict
Muse Glimmer-30B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7, Seed 2.1 Pro — 0.6.
Recency
Muse Glimmer-30B is newer: released 8/10/2026 vs 6/24/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Muse Glimmer-30B or Seed 2.1 Pro?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Glimmer-30B or Seed 2.1 Pro?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Glimmer-30B or Seed 2.1 Pro?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The Muse Glimmer-30B and Seed 2.1 Pro comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Glimmer-30B or Seed 2.1 Pro page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.