Muse Glimmer-30B vs Sakana Namazu: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta, while Sakana Namazu comes from Sakana AI. Both were released in August 2026. Muse Glimmer-30B has a published size of about 30 billion parameters; Sakana AI has not disclosed the parameter count of Sakana Namazu.
We have 25 benchmark results for Muse Glimmer-30B and 3 benchmark results for Sakana Namazu, but they overlap on a single test: AIME 2026, where Sakana Namazu scores 96.7% against 94.7%.
Sakana Namazu is available through an API at $0.95 per million input tokens with a 256K-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Muse Glimmer-30B, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.
| Characteristic | Muse Glimmer-30B | Sakana Namazu |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meta | Sakana AI |
| Release Date | August 10, 2026 | August 3, 2026 |
| Parameters | 30B | — |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | — | 256K |
| Context (output) | — | 256K |
| Input Price / 1M | — | $0.95 |
| Output Price / 1M | — | $4.00 |
| Average Score | 65.1% | 92.4% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2026 | 94.7% | 96.7% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.
Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7, Sakana Namazu — 0.9.
Both models were released around the same time: 8/10/2026 and 8/3/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Muse Glimmer-30B or Sakana Namazu?
Which model is cheaper — Muse Glimmer-30B or Sakana Namazu?
Which has a larger context window — Muse Glimmer-30B or Sakana Namazu?
The Muse Glimmer-30B and Sakana Namazu comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Glimmer-30B or Sakana Namazu page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.