Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5GPT-6 Astra
CompanyAnthropicOpenAI
Release DateJune 9, 2026September 3, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.1M
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$10.00
Output Price / 1M$50.00$50.00
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
AutomationBench0.20.4
ExploitBench0.81.0
DeepSWE 1.10.70.7
HealthBench Professional0.70.6
FrontierCode 1.10.50.5

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5
GPT-6 Astra
AutomationBench0.2 vs 0.4
0.2
0.4
ExploitBench0.8 vs 1.0
0.8
1.0
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
HealthBench Professional0.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
FrontierCode 1.10.5 vs 0.5
0.5
0.5

Verdict

GPT-6 Astra leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, GPT-6 Astra — 0.7.

API Cost

API cost is identical: input $10.00/1M, output $50.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

GPT-6 Astra is newer: released 9/3/2026 vs 6/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or GPT-6 Astra?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or GPT-6 Astra?
Claude Fable 5 is cheaper for input: $10.00 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra supports a larger context: 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Fable 5 and GPT-6 Astra comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or GPT-6 Astra page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.