Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5Muse Spark 1.3
CompanyAnthropicMeta
Release DateJune 9, 2026September 2, 2026
Parameters
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K944K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.10
Output Price / 1M$50.00$0.20
Average Score0.60.7
Benchmarks
AutomationBench0.20.5
DeepSWE 1.10.70.8
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5
Muse Spark 1.3
AutomationBench0.2 vs 0.5
0.2
0.5
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9

Verdict

Muse Spark 1.3 leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, Muse Spark 1.3 — 0.7.

API Cost

Muse Spark 1.3 is 200.0x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Muse Spark 1.3 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Muse Spark 1.3 is newer: released 9/2/2026 vs 6/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Fable 5 and Muse Spark 1.3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark 1.3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.