GLM-5.1 vs Grok 4.5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.1 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | xAI |
| Release Date | April 7, 2026 | July 16, 2026 |
| Parameters | 754B | — |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 200K | 500K |
| Context (output) | 131K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | $6.00 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.1
Grok 4.5
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Grok 4.5 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.1 — 0.9, Grok 4.5 — 0.8.
API Cost
GLM-5.1 is 1.4x cheaper: input $1.40/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Grok 4.5 supports a larger context: 500K vs 200K tokens.
Recency
Grok 4.5 is newer: released 7/16/2026 vs 4/7/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.1 or Grok 4.5?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.1 or Grok 4.5?
GLM-5.1 is cheaper for input: $1.40 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.1 or Grok 4.5?
Grok 4.5 supports a larger context: 500,000 tokens vs 200,000.
The GLM-5.1 and Grok 4.5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.1 or Grok 4.5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.