GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | April 7, 2026 | February 15, 2026 |
| Parameters | 754B | 397B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 200K | — |
| Context (output) | 131K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | — |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2026 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| HMMT 2025 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.1
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
AIME 20260.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
HMMT 20250.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
GLM-5.1 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.1 — 0.9, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B — 0.9.
Recency
GLM-5.1 is newer: released 4/7/2026 vs 2/15/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The GLM-5.1 and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.