GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.6-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | April 7, 2026 | April 21, 2026 |
| Parameters | 754B | 28B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 200K | 262K |
| Context (output) | 131K | 66K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | $0.60 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | $3.60 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 1.0 |
Verdict
Qwen3.6-27B leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.1 — 0.9, Qwen3.6-27B — 1.0.
API Cost
Qwen3.6-27B is 1.4x cheaper: input $0.60/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Context Window
Qwen3.6-27B supports a larger context: 262K vs 200K tokens.
Recency
Qwen3.6-27B is newer: released 4/21/2026 vs 4/7/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3.6-27B is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3.6-27B supports a larger context: 262,144 tokens vs 200,000.
The GLM-5.1 and Qwen3.6-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.