GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Plus: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Zhipu AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | April 7, 2026 | March 31, 2026 |
| Parameters | 754B | — |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 200K | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 131K | 66K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.40 | $0.50 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.40 | $3.00 |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| HMMT 2025 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| AIME 2026 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
GLM-5.1
Qwen3.6 Plus
HMMT 20250.9 vs 1.0
0.9
1.0
AIME 20260.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3.6 Plus leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: GLM-5.1 — 0.9, Qwen3.6 Plus — 1.0.
API Cost
Qwen3.6 Plus is 1.7x cheaper: input $0.50/1M vs $1.40/1M tokens.
Context Window
Qwen3.6 Plus supports a larger context: 1M vs 200K tokens.
Recency
Both models were released around the same time: 4/7/2026 and 3/31/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper for input: $0.50 per 1M tokens vs $1.40.
Which has a larger context window — GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000.
The GLM-5.1 and Qwen3.6 Plus comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.