MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro both come from Xiaomi, and both were released in September 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the larger model at roughly 1.0 trillion parameters, against 309 billion for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
The two models share 16 published benchmarks. MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads on 15 of them, MiMo-V2.6-Flash on 1. The widest gaps are on ExploitBench, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 47.9% against 25.3%; SEC-bench Pro, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 66.3% against 47.5%. Averaged across everything we track, MiMo-V2.6-Flash sits at 55.6% and MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 59.7%.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the cheaper API at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens, roughly 3 times cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.43 and $0.87. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Both accept text, images, audio, and video as input.
| Characteristic | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | September 22, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Parameters | 309B | 1.0T |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Average Score | 55.6% | 59.7% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| ExploitBench | 25.3% | 47.9% |
| SEC-bench Pro | 47.5% | 66.3% |
| ExploitGym | 6.0% | 17.8% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 28.8% | 34.9% |
| MiMo Cyber Bench | 77.2% | 81.7% |
| Agents' Last Exam | 27.6% | 31.6% |
| DeepSWE 1.1 | 67.9% | 71.9% |
| Toolathlon-Verified | 73.6% | 76.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 87.6% | 89.9% |
| MiMo Coding Bench | 61.2% | 63.2% |
| OSWorld-Verified | 80.8% | 82.0% |
| CyberGym | 95.1% | 94.0% |
| AutomationBench v1.0.6 | 52.3% | 53.1% |
| JobBench | 61.2% | 62.0% |
| MiMo Visual Coding | 71.5% | 72.3% |
| Program Bench | 26.0% | 26.5% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: MiMo-V2.6-Flash — 0.6, MiMo-V2.6-Pro — 0.6.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.1x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $0.43/1M tokens.
Same context size: 1M tokens.
Both models were released around the same time: 9/22/2026 and 9/22/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Which model is cheaper — MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Which has a larger context window — MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
The MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.