MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.5 27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | MiniMax M3 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | MiniMax | Alibaba |
| Release Date | June 1, 2026 | March 1, 2026 |
| Parameters | 428B | 27B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 131K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.30 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $1.20 | — |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Verdict
MiniMax M3 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: MiniMax M3 — 0.9, Qwen3.5 27B — 0.9.
Recency
MiniMax M3 is newer: released 6/1/2026 vs 3/1/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5 27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5 27B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5 27B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5 27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.