Pixtral Large vs Qwen3.5 27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | November 18, 2024 | March 1, 2026 |
| Parameters | 124B | 27B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 128K | — |
| Context (output) | 128K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $2.00 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $6.00 | — |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AI2D | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Pixtral Large
Qwen3.5 27B
AI2D0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3.5 27B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Pixtral Large — 0.8, Qwen3.5 27B — 0.9.
Recency
Qwen3.5 27B is newer: released 3/1/2026 vs 11/18/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Pixtral Large or Qwen3.5 27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Pixtral Large or Qwen3.5 27B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Pixtral Large or Qwen3.5 27B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The Pixtral Large and Qwen3.5 27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Pixtral Large or Qwen3.5 27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.