Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next comes from Alibaba. Both were released in August 2026. The two are similar in size, at about 124 billion and 180 billion parameters respectively.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads on 4 of them. The widest gaps are on LiveCodeBench v6, where Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 91.9% against 82.8%; SWE-bench Multilingual, where Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 81.0% against 72.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Ling 3.0 Flash sits at 68.5% and Qwen3.8 Flash Next at 67.1%.

Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 3 times cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash Next at $0.16 and $0.47. Qwen3.8 Flash Next takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 131K for Ling 3.0 Flash. Ling 3.0 Flash accepts text as input, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next accepts text, images, and video. On tooling, only Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports function calling and only Qwen3.8 Flash Next offers structured output.

CharacteristicLing 3.0 FlashQwen3.8 Flash Next
CompanyInclusionAIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 4, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters124B180B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)131K1.0M
Context (output)131K66K
Input Price / 1M$0.06$0.16
Output Price / 1M$0.18$0.47
Average Score68.5%67.1%
Benchmarks
LiveCodeBench v682.8%91.9%
SWE-bench Multilingual72.4%81.0%
IFBench74.5%81.3%
SWE-Bench Pro56.6%62.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
LiveCodeBench v60.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
SWE-bench Multilingual0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
IFBench0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7.

API Cost

Ling 3.0 Flash is 2.6x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $0.16/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1M vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/4/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.06 per 1M tokens vs $0.16.
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 131,072.

The Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash Next page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.