MiniMax M2 vs Pixtral Large: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | MiniMax M2 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Company | MiniMax | Mistral AI |
| Release Date | October 26, 2025 | November 18, 2024 |
| Parameters | 230B | 124B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 128K |
| Context (output) | 100K | 128K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.00 | $6.00 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Verdict
MiniMax M2 leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: MiniMax M2 — 0.8, Pixtral Large — 0.8.
API Cost
MiniMax M2 is 1.6x cheaper: input $1.00/1M vs $2.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
MiniMax M2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.
Recency
MiniMax M2 is newer: released 10/26/2025 vs 11/18/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — MiniMax M2 or Pixtral Large?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — MiniMax M2 or Pixtral Large?
MiniMax M2 is cheaper for input: $1.00 per 1M tokens vs $2.00.
Which has a larger context window — MiniMax M2 or Pixtral Large?
MiniMax M2 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000.
The MiniMax M2 and Pixtral Large comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the MiniMax M2 or Pixtral Large page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.