Ling 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while Muse Spark 1.1 comes from Meta. Muse Spark 1.1 was released in July 2026, and Ling 3.0 Flash followed a month later in August 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash has a published size of about 124 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Spark 1.1.
The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 leads on 3 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Muse Spark 1.1 scores 80.0% against 57.0%; MCP Atlas, where Muse Spark 1.1 scores 88.0% against 65.5%. Averaged across everything we track, Ling 3.0 Flash sits at 68.5% and Muse Spark 1.1 at 70.7%.
Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 21 times cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $1.25 and $4.25. Muse Spark 1.1 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 131K for Ling 3.0 Flash. Ling 3.0 Flash accepts text as input, while Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text and images. On tooling, only Muse Spark 1.1 supports function calling and only Muse Spark 1.1 offers structured output.
| Characteristic | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | InclusionAI | Meta |
| Release Date | August 4, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Parameters | 124B | — |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Context (input) | 131K | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 131K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.06 | $1.25 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.18 | $4.25 |
| Average Score | 68.5% | 70.7% |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 57.0% | 80.0% |
| MCP Atlas | 65.5% | 88.0% |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 56.6% | 61.5% |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7, Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.7.
Ling 3.0 Flash is 22.9x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 131K tokens.
Ling 3.0 Flash is newer: released 8/4/2026 vs 7/9/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?
The Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.