Ling 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while Muse Spark 1.2 comes from Meta. Both were released in August 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash has a published size of about 124 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Spark 1.2.

We have 19 benchmark results for Ling 3.0 Flash and 3 benchmark results for Muse Spark 1.2, but they overlap on a single test: Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Muse Spark 1.2 scores 83.0% against 57.0%.

Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 21 times cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2 at $1.25 and $4.25. Muse Spark 1.2 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 131K for Ling 3.0 Flash. Ling 3.0 Flash accepts text as input, while Muse Spark 1.2 accepts text and images. On tooling, only Muse Spark 1.2 supports function calling and only Muse Spark 1.2 offers structured output.

CharacteristicLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.2
CompanyInclusionAIMeta
Release DateAugust 4, 2026August 5, 2026
Parameters124B—
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)131K1.0M
Context (output)131K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.06$1.25
Output Price / 1M$0.18$4.25
Average Score68.5%71.0%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.157.0%83.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash
Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench 2.10.6 vs 0.8
0.6
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7, Muse Spark 1.2 — 0.7.

API Cost

Ling 3.0 Flash is 22.9x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

Muse Spark 1.2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/4/2026 and 8/5/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?
Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.06 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 131,072.

The Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.