Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while Qwen3.8-27B comes from Alibaba. Both were released in August 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash is the larger model at roughly 124 billion parameters, against 28 billion for Qwen3.8-27B.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8-27B leads on 4 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Qwen3.8-27B scores 73.0% against 57.0%; LiveCodeBench v6, where Qwen3.8-27B scores 90.3% against 82.8%. Averaged across everything we track, Ling 3.0 Flash sits at 68.5% and Qwen3.8-27B at 66.3%.

Ling 3.0 Flash is available through an API at $0.06 per million input tokens with a 131K-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Qwen3.8-27B, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.

CharacteristicLing 3.0 FlashQwen3.8-27B
CompanyInclusionAIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 4, 2026August 14, 2026
Parameters124B28B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)131K
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$0.06
Output Price / 1M$0.18
Average Score68.5%66.3%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.157.0%73.0%
LiveCodeBench v682.8%90.3%
SWE-Bench Pro56.6%61.7%
IFBench74.5%79.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash
Qwen3.8-27B
Terminal-Bench 2.10.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7
LiveCodeBench v60.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
IFBench0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7, Qwen3.8-27B — 0.7.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/4/2026 and 8/14/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8-27B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8-27B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3.8-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.