Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while Qwen3.8 Max comes from Alibaba. Both were released in August 2026. Qwen3.8 Max is the larger model at roughly 2.4 trillion parameters, against 124 billion for Ling 3.0 Flash.

The two models share 5 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max leads on 5 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Qwen3.8 Max scores 86.6% against 57.0%; SkillsBench, where Qwen3.8 Max scores 70.2% against 44.8%. Averaged across everything we track, Ling 3.0 Flash sits at 68.5% and Qwen3.8 Max at 71.0%.

Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 42 times cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max at $2.50 and $6.25. Qwen3.8 Max takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 131K for Ling 3.0 Flash. Ling 3.0 Flash accepts text as input, while Qwen3.8 Max accepts text and images. On tooling, only Qwen3.8 Max supports function calling and only Qwen3.8 Max offers structured output.

CharacteristicLing 3.0 FlashQwen3.8 Max
CompanyInclusionAIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 4, 2026August 2, 2026
Parameters124B2.4T
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)131K1.0M
Context (output)131K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.06$2.50
Output Price / 1M$0.18$6.25
Average Score68.5%71.0%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.157.0%86.6%
SkillsBench44.8%70.2%
SWE-Bench Pro56.6%67.7%
IFBench74.5%82.8%
WideSearch73.6%81.9%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash
Qwen3.8 Max
Terminal-Bench 2.10.6 vs 0.9
0.6
0.9
SkillsBench0.4 vs 0.7
0.4
0.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.7
0.6
0.7
IFBench0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
WideSearch0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Max — 0.7.

API Cost

Ling 3.0 Flash is 36.5x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $2.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Max supports a larger context: 1M vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/4/2026 and 8/2/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max?
Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.06 per 1M tokens vs $2.50.
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 131,072.

The Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.