MiniMax M2 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicMiniMax M2Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
CompanyMiniMaxAlibaba
Release DateOctober 26, 2025September 9, 2025
Parameters230B80B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)1.0M66K
Context (output)100K66K
Input Price / 1M$1.00$0.15
Output Price / 1M$4.00$1.50
Average Score0.80.9

Verdict

MiniMax M2 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: MiniMax M2 — 0.8, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is 3.0x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $1.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

MiniMax M2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 66K tokens.

Recency

MiniMax M2 is newer: released 10/26/2025 vs 9/9/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — MiniMax M2 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — MiniMax M2 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $1.00.
Which has a larger context window — MiniMax M2 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?
MiniMax M2 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 65,536.

The MiniMax M2 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the MiniMax M2 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.